
So I've been doing some work at a prop trading firm here in Auckland, dealing with mostly Asian index futures. There's some pretty cool folks at the firm, and the IT equipment is "hardcore" enough to pull off some of my strategies where optimal return comes from low-latency execution.
But what's really bothering me is the fact that 100% of what I do to make $$ these days requires skills that I could've gotten off a few books at the local bookshop and maybe a year or two of practical experience, all for $500~ tops! Yet, I've already paid over $100k in tuition for this Bachelor of Honours degree.
Sure, some people would say that "well it's a good piece of paper, it gets you a job interview (if your personal ventures fail miserably)". Still, there're plenty of people like me sitting on the employer side who KNOW that a university degree simply means one can show up on time and maybe type up a neat little report every half year or so, without any practical experience or ability to think critically.
So yeah, is it really worth it? I'd say not.
Sunday, October 24, 2010
College degree, not really worth it
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Smaller class advantages
Sometimes higher rated schools do not necessary guarantee satisfying college/university lives. Due to smaller classes, the administration folks at School of Computing & Mathematical Sciences, AUT, have provided personalized and productive experiences for everyone.
Interaction and enthusiasm
It allows students to interact much more freely and timely with each other, and the professors. This means more active participation, no more one-sided lecture and furious note taking drills. Reducing boredom, the whole learning thing becomes that much easier.
Social perks
Due to the frequent dialogues between students and professors, everyone has a better chance at making new friends and connections. Having friends in the school administration means timely scholarship application information, potential course changes, and maybe even casual campus or outside job offers. It is all quite rewarding.
Higher marketing spending does not mean better experience
I have met some people who had attended Auckland University, and found the experience unsatisfying, largely due to packed classrooms, tedious lectures, having little direct contact with professors, and etc. Sure, some schools have awesome reputation and it means little if they offer nothing but dry, mind-numbing talks.
Unconventional as it sounds, schools with smaller enrollees could present better learning experiences because the management (potentially caring) folks are capable of taking things from a ground up level. Instead of some statistic at a massive university, it feels nice to study at a smaller campus, and treated as a unique individual.
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Impressive Financial Forecasting with SVR

A couple of researchers (Li, Hu, and Hirosawa) have displayed pretty interesting findings forecasting the USD/JPY exchange rate via a Support Vector Regression (SVR) network. The file explains the details. Let's break down what they did and accuracy results from the empirical test.
Basic idea of SVR: Nonlinear mapping of data into a high dimensional feature space with a kernel function, then do a linear regression in the transformed space. It all results in a nonlinear regression in low dimensional space.
Inputs of their study:
f(t): Historical USD/JPY exchange rate
F
(t): Historical USD/EUR exchange rate
N(t): Historical NIKKEI 225 stock index value
O(t): Historical oil price in USD
Prediction evaluation tools:
Sum of Square Error (SSE)
Mean Absolute Error (MAE)
SSE and MAE measure deviation between actual and forecasted values, so the smaller the better the accuracy of forecasts.I find the MAE more practical of course since it isn't squared.
Correct Up Trend (CP)
Correct Down Trend (CD)
CP and CD basically gives the probability of forecast being correct for the next-day USD/JPY direction. So higher is better.
The results compared those of conventional SVR models and SVR network:
| USD/JPY | Stat | SVR | SVR N |
| f(t+1) | sse | 47.3925 | 36.2098 |
| | mae | 0.1672 | 0.1471 |
| | cp | 76.8116 | 77.8468 |
| | cd | 79.4118 | 79.8039 |
| | | | |
| f(t+5) | sse | 60.5918 | 38.4611 |
| | mae | 0.1877 | 0.152 |
| | cp | 76.7635 | 79.668 |
| | cd | 78.3465 | 79.3307 |
| | | | |
| f(t+10) | sse | 71.5295 | 39.7972 |
| | mae | 0.2052 | 0.1544 |
| | cp | 77.453 | 80.167 |
| | cd | 78.937 | 79.9213 |
So we can see that this is impressive for both SVR and especially the SVR Network. Directionally it's correct close to 80% of the time and an average error of within 0.15 Yen (with respect to daily range), for all three time frame predictions.
A lot of people don't look at this stuff because it takes a lot of thinking, so they convince themselves that it "doesn't work anyway". Well I'm here to tell you that IT DOES.